What do you think?

Let me write about my last three courses more:
1.Spring 2010 BCS122X Peoples and Cultures of the Circumpolar World II
2.Autumn 2010 SA210S Scandinavian Politics
3.Spring 2011 BCS110X Land and Environment of the Circumpolar World

This is to present my introduction of each course.

1.Peoples and Cultures of the Circumpolar World II
What can be done to revitalize indigenous peoples’ languages in the Circumpolar North? Discuss this issue.
>>As we do think about language, it is very extremely fundamental to our lives, we can see that it is essential to group identity. It is the way that a people in a group communicate to one another and make sense of their own world. It is the transfer method which we learn about our group’s culture. Language is part of a chain of knowledge. This is to say language is such an important part of culture and identity.................

2.Scandinavian Politics
The Nordic countries are often described by words such as Welfare States, (Neo-)Corporatist Societies and Consensual Democracies. Describe what is meant by these terms. Give arguments for and against a Social Democratic Welfare Regime.
>>The Nordic countries' characteristics found, full employment, high degree of equality, a high level of taxes and a high level of public spending on welfare. This is to say that why the Nordic countries are often described by words such as Welfare States, (Neo-)Corporatist Societies and Consensual Democracies. What is meant by these terms:..................

3.Land and Environment of the Circumpolar World
Give an account of the different aspects of the concept of “nordicity”. Explain the role and significance of natural resources in the north and how they may impact on the people living in the North.
>>As majority views, the North are not much surveyed for established matter. How the actual perception of the region, or the understanding of the aspect of the North can be defined. To emphasize the aspects of territory and organise the understanding is complexity. To delimit the concept of “nordicity” requiring formulation in both the natuaral element and social science. As geography provides a spatial perspective, which enables us to see that societies occupy territories whose many differences include differences of scale, and that they relate to the territory...........

What do you think?